Published:
Views: 1572

Supreme Court Sides with Landowner in Rails-to-Trails Case

Throughout the 19th century, Congress would spur track expansion by granting tracts of land and other property rights to private railroad operators. These days, however, more tracks are getting torn up than put down. In many instances, this causes certain

RailroadTracts_lg

Throughout the 19th century, Congress would spur track expansion by granting tracts of land and other property rights to private railroad operators. These days, however, more tracks are getting torn up than put down. In many instances, this causes certain property rights to revert back to original owners. At least that’s how it’s supposed to happen, according to a landmark Supreme Court decision in March that focused on rails-to-trails projects. One justice wrote that Congress “granted an easement and nothing more” – meaning that without an operating rail system there are no lingering right-of-ways for recreational trails. Although the ruling centered on a case in Wyoming’s Medicine Bow National Forest, its impact will be felt in dozens of states with ongoing cases where owners are challenging rails-to-trails projects.

Read more here.

Posted in Feature, Federal Policy, News Desk, Public Land, West, Wyoming

EMAIL SIGNUP

Please sign me up to receive breaking news and updates from the Land Report!

Latest Tweets

News By Region

The Land Report | 2018 America's Best Brokerages
The Land Report is proudly partnered with: Hall and Hall Bates Land Consortium Mossy Oak Properties United Country Real Estate Live Water Properties Fay Ranches Inc. Mirr Ranch Group californiaoutdoorproperties.com Whitetail Properties TerraStone Land Company Hayden Outdoors Real Estate Western Ranches
Pacific West Great Plains Great Lakes Midwest Southwest South Northeast Pacific West Great Plains Great Lakes Midwest Southwest South Northeast