<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LandReport.com &#187; thinning timber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landreport.com/tag/thinning-timber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landreport.com</link>
	<description>The Magazine of the American Landowner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>3rd Row or 5th Row Thinning?</title>
		<link>http://www.landreport.com/2008/10/5th-row-or-3rd-row-thinning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.landreport.com/2008/10/5th-row-or-3rd-row-thinning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Land Report Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Forest Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinning timber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landreport.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: What’s the benefits of 3rd row versus 5th row thinning?
A:The purpose of most thinning operations are: remove suppressed, diseased trees and reduce stems/ac to encourage continued growth on the remaining stems.
In a 3rd row thinning operation you take out 33% of the stems when you remove the cutout row, in a 5th row thinning [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.landreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/thin.jpg"><strong><a href="http://www.landreport.com/2008/10/5th-row-or-3rd-row-thinning/"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-347" title="thin" src="http://www.landreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/thin.jpg" alt="" width="290" height="200" /></a></strong></a>Q: What’s the benefits of 3rd row versus 5th row thinning?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.landreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/thin.jpg"></a>A:The purpose of most thinning operations are: remove suppressed, diseased trees and reduce stems/ac to encourage continued growth on the remaining stems.</p>
<p><span id="more-346"></span>In a 3rd row thinning operation you take out 33% of the stems when you remove the cutout row, in a 5th row thinning operation you remove 20% of the stems when you remove the cutout row. If your timber stand is well stocked, with little disease or stem quality issues, then either a 3rd or 5th row operation may be suitable.</p>
<p>If you have an initial low stocking rate or have an above average amount of diseased and inferior trees, you would probably want to go with a 5th operation. The reason for this is that taking out only every 5th row vs. every 3rd row allows you more choices when selecting which trees from the remaining rows to harvest.</p>
<p>Sometimes there are also site or contractor equipment type issues to consider. I personally like 5th row operations in most instances as I like to have more control over which trees are harvested from the remaining rows. The quality of your 1st and/or 2nd thinning will have a large impact on the overall return of your timber investment.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.landreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/chuck-mathis.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-348" style="float: left;" title="chuck-mathis" src="http://www.landreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/chuck-mathis.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="100" /></a>Chuck Mathis,<br />
AFM Regional Manager: MS, AL, &amp; FL<br />
Bonifay, Florida<br />
(850) 547-2534<br />
<a href="mailto:chuck.mathis@amforem.biz">chuck.mathis@amforem.biz</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.landreport.com/2008/10/5th-row-or-3rd-row-thinning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
