<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LandReport.com &#187; Max Baucus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landreport.com/tag/max-baucus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landreport.com</link>
	<description>The Magazine of the American Landowner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Max Baucus Out to Ax Timber Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.landreport.com/2008/04/max-baucus-out-to-ax-timber-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.landreport.com/2008/04/max-baucus-out-to-ax-timber-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric OKeefe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric OKeefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field Reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plum Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potlatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate investment trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timber REIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landreport.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timber sales are typically taxed at the standard 15 percent capital gain rate. Yet timber companies typically pay the standard 35 percent corporate tax rate. This quirk in the tax law has led many timber companies including Plum Creek and Potlatch to restructure as real estate investment trusts (REITs), which enables them to take advantage of the lower 15 [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.landreport.com/2008/04/max-baucus-out-to-ax-timber-tax/"><a href="http://www.landreport.com/2008/04/max-baucus-out-to-ax-timber-tax/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-147" title="baucus-290" src="http://www.landreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/baucus-290.jpg" alt="" width="290" height="200" /></a></a>Timber sales are typically taxed at the standard 15 percent capital gain rate. Yet timber companies typically pay the standard 35 percent corporate tax rate. This quirk in the tax law has led many timber companies including Plum Creek and Potlatch to restructure as real estate investment trusts (REITs), which enables them to take advantage of the lower 15 percent rate. Montana Senator Max Baucus wants to change that.<br />
<span id="more-146"></span></p>
<p>Now the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus (D-Montana), wants all timber concerns to pay that rate, and he&#8217;s attempting to get this proviso added to the farm bill now before Congress.<a href="None"></a>The Op-Ed page in today&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120934099382148443-lMyQjAxMDI4MDI5ODMyNDgwWj.html">Wall Street Journal</a> wants Baucus, who recently advocated a tax hike on hedge funds and private-equity shops, to extend a similar tax break across the board <em>to all corporations</em>. No surprise here. My question is if a solution already exists &#8211; shedding corporation status and restructuring as a REIT &#8211; why more timber companies aren&#8217;t going that route already?</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.landreport.com/2008/04/max-baucus-out-to-ax-timber-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preserving Endangered Species for Profit</title>
		<link>http://www.landreport.com/2007/05/preserving-endangered-species-for-profit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.landreport.com/2007/05/preserving-endangered-species-for-profit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Guinto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field Reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Guinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama red-bellied turtle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endangered Species Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landreport.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who can save the Alabama red-bellied turtle? Maybe your accountant can. He or she will have a chance if Congress passes new legislation that would give tax breaks to landowners who act to preserve species like the Alabama red-bellied turtle, one of the creatures considered endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. BY JOSEPH [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who can save the Alabama red-bellied turtle? Maybe your accountant can. He or she will have a chance if Congress passes new legislation that would give tax breaks to landowners who act to preserve species like the Alabama red-bellied turtle, one of the creatures considered endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.<span id="more-366"></span></p>
<p><strong>BY JOSEPH GUINTO<br />
PUBLISHED MAY 2007</strong></p>
<p>To date, the best hope for the turtle and others were protections granted them under the Endangered Species Act, a 1973 law that promises to safeguard nearly 1,300 birds, amphibians, mammals, fish, and plants.</p>
<p>For all its good intentions, the ESA has been surrounded by controversy for the restrictions that were imposed on landowners whose properties are home to the endangered. &#8220;Private property owners &#8230; have been victims of the restrictions mandated by the original law,&#8221; says Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska).</p>
<p>Still, there is little political will in Washington for rewriting the act itself. Now lawmakers are hoping tax incentives will help make it obsolete. This year, bipartisan groups in the House and Senate have proposed legislation that would give tax credits to landowners if they spend their own money to protect and recover endangered and threatened species that live on or migrate through their property. The bills would also give landowners a tax break if they agree not to sell or develop land where endangered species live.</p>
<p>As of press time, no floor action was scheduled on either the House or Senate bills. But with Congress in a &#8220;green&#8221; mood, Capitol Hill watchers consider the chances good for action on the tax breaks. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana) may be the key. He&#8217;s chair of the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees tax-break legislation. &#8220;It&#8217;s pretty hard to jam something down somebody&#8217;s throat,&#8221; Baucus says of the ESA. &#8220;The more we move toward encouraging people to take actions on their own, the more we&#8217;re going to achieve the results we&#8217;re looking for.&#8221;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.landreport.com/2007/05/preserving-endangered-species-for-profit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

